Prediction of Federico Gaio [749th] vs Nikola Milojevic [868th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W L W W L
Form
W W W W L W L W W LHead-To-Head: Gaio 2 - 0 Milojevic
They have played 4 sets in total, with Gaio winning 4 and Milojevic winning 0. The last match between Gaio and Milojevic was at the Ortisei Challenger, 09-11-2016, Second, I.hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | 2 |
| Nikola Milojevic | 0 |
| Gaio | Stats | Milojevic |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 67% (2-1) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 749 | Ranking | 868 |
| 124 | Highest Rank | 125 |
| 33 | Age | 29 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 15 |
| 55% (526-439) | Career Total W/L | 60% (372-252) |
| $392,005 | Career Prize Money | $335,730 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Federico Gaio
Player
Nikola Milojevic
38%
(
21 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Nikola Milojevic
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 11 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 1:8:40 | Average Match Time | 1:8:40 |
| 44% (44/99) | 1st Serve % | 52% (60/115) |
| 80% (35/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (34/60) |
| 60% (33/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (24/55) |
| 47% (9/19) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 50% (57/115) | Return Points Win % | 31% (31/99) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Federico Gaio vs Nikola Milojevic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gaio 2 - 0 Milojevic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gaio has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Milojevic has won 49.17%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gaio, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Milojevic has won 47.59%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gaio has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Milojevic has saved 53.57% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gaio has won 64.71% of matches played (W/L 11/ 6), with Milojevic winning 59.38% (W/L 19/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gaio has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 334/ 256), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 5/ 9). Milojevic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 189/ 93), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gaio has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 6/ 3), where as Milojevic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gaio winning 2 times and Milojevic being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Gaio winning 4 and Milojevic winning 0. The last match between Gaio and Milojevic was at the Ortisei Challenger, 09-11-2016, Second, I.hard with Federico Gaio getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gaio and Milojevic have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gaio winning 0 times and Milojevic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gaio winning 0, and Milojevic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gaio has played against opponents with an average rank of 381.59 while Milojevic has played against players with an average rank of 415.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gaio has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Milojevic has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gaio has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Milojevic has converted 33.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Federico Gaio Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nikola Milojevic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-2 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Savriyan Danilov
Player
Nikola Milojevic
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
43 of
63)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Zach Stephens
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Nikola Milojevic
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Eero Vasa
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
108)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
53 of
66)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
48 of
73)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
21%
(
19 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
37 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Philip Hjorth
80%
(
56 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
64
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Milojevic
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Gaio vs Milojevic?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Gaio Vs Milojevic is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (526/439) | Win/Loss | 60% (372/252) |
| 53% (1205/1068) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (836/585) |
| 51% (11068/10593) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (7159/6150) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 3004 | Aces Total | 1757 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 2390 | Total Double Faults | 1946 |
| 1:9:27 | Average Match Time | 1:19:35 |
| 553.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 526.98 |
| 58% (27135/47153) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19943/33694) |
| 71% (19324/27135) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (13855/19943) |
| 51% (10139/20018) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (6661/13751) |
| 39% (1750/4458) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1588/3610) |
| 38% (18415/48497) | Return Points Win % | 41% (14176/34444) |
| 54% (515/949) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (366/604) |
| 67% (6/9) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (3/9) |
| 46% (141/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (89/165) |
| 54% (183/340) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (84/172) |
| 85% (511/435) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (378/325) |
| 15% (511/76) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (378/52) |
| 20% (454/90) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (246/48) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
